Pork sausage, reduced sodium, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork sausage, reduced sodium, cooked
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Pork sausage, reduced sodium, cooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 271 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pork sausage, reduced sodium, cooked has 201% more |
| Protein | 9.41 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pork sausage, reduced sodium, cooked has 368% more |
| Carbs | 8.13 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
| Fat | 22.35 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pork sausage, reduced sodium, cooked has 14800% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 294 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pork sausage, reduced sodium, cooked has 717% more |
| Calcium | 0 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Iron | 0.85 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pork sausage, reduced sodium, cooked has 23% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 160 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 66% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.