Prickly pears, broiled (Northern Plains Indians) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Prickly pears, broiled (Northern Plains Indians)
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Prickly pears, broiled (Northern Plains Indians) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 91 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Prickly pears, broiled (Northern Plains Indians) has 1% more |
| Protein | 0.39 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 81% more |
| Carbs | 21.57 g ★ | 20.71 g | Prickly pears, broiled (Northern Plains Indians) has 4% more |
| Fat | 0.31 g | 0.15 g ★ | Prickly pears, broiled (Northern Plains Indians) has 107% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Calcium | 0 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Iron | 0 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Vitamin C | 6.2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.