Prunes, dehydrated (low-moisture), stewed vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Prunes, dehydrated (low-moisture), stewed
7 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
3 wins
| Nutrient | Prunes, dehydrated (low-moisture), stewed | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 113 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 6% more |
| Protein | 1.23 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 72% more |
| Carbs | 29.7 g ★ | 21.3 g | Prunes, dehydrated (low-moisture), stewed has 39% more |
| Fat | 0.24 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 88% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 2 mg ★ | 7 mg | Quinoa, cooked has 71% more |
| Calcium | 24 mg ★ | 17 mg | Prunes, dehydrated (low-moisture), stewed has 41% more |
| Iron | 1.17 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 21% more |
| Potassium | 353 mg ★ | 172 mg | Prunes, dehydrated (low-moisture), stewed has 105% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.