Purslane, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Purslane, raw
7 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
4 wins
| Nutrient | Purslane, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 20 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 78% more |
| Protein | 2.03 g ★ | 2.01 g | Purslane, raw has 1% more |
| Carbs | 3.39 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more |
| Fat | 0.36 g | 0.15 g ★ | Purslane, raw has 140% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 45 mg | 36 mg ★ | Purslane, raw has 25% more |
| Calcium | 65 mg ★ | 38 mg | Purslane, raw has 71% more |
| Iron | 1.99 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Purslane, raw has 188% more |
| Vitamin C | 21 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Purslane, raw has 7% more |
| Potassium | 494 mg ★ | 475 mg | Purslane, raw has 4% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.