Quinoa, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Quinoa, cooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 120 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 33% more |
| Protein | 4.4 g ★ | 2.01 g | Quinoa, cooked has 119% more |
| Carbs | 21.3 g ★ | 20.71 g | Quinoa, cooked has 3% more |
| Fat | 1.92 g | 0.15 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 1180% more |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 15% more |
| Sugar | 0.87 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 87% more |
| Sodium | 7 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 81% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
| Iron | 1.49 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Quinoa, cooked has 116% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 172 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 64% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.