Raspberries, puree, seedless vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Raspberries, puree, seedless
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Raspberries, puree, seedless | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 41 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 54% more |
| Protein | 1.02 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 49% more |
| Carbs | 7.99 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
| Fat | 0.87 g | 0.15 g ★ | Raspberries, puree, seedless has 480% more |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 73% more |
| Sugar | 6.04 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 7% more |
| Sodium | 4 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Calcium | 14 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more |
| Iron | 1.08 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Raspberries, puree, seedless has 57% more |
| Vitamin C | 6.4 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
| Potassium | 169 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 64% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.