Raspberries, puree, with seeds vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Raspberries, puree, with seeds
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Raspberries, puree, with seeds | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 55 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 39% more |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
| Carbs | 11.51 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 44% more |
| Fat | 0.97 g | 0.15 g ★ | Raspberries, puree, with seeds has 547% more |
| Fiber | 4.3 g ★ | 3.3 g | Raspberries, puree, with seeds has 30% more |
| Sugar | 6.56 g | 6.48 g ★ | Raspberries, puree, with seeds has 1% more |
| Sodium | 4 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Calcium | 23 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 39% more |
| Iron | 0.69 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Equal |
| Vitamin C | 14.6 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 26% more |
| Potassium | 195 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 59% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.