Raspberries, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Raspberries, raw
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Raspberries, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 52 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 40% more |
| Carbs | 11.94 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
| Fat | 0.65 g | 0.15 g ★ | Raspberries, raw has 333% more |
| Fiber | 6.5 g ★ | 3.3 g | Raspberries, raw has 97% more |
| Sugar | 4.42 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 32% more |
| Sodium | 1 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Calcium | 25 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 34% more |
| Iron | 0.69 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Equal |
| Vitamin C | 26.2 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Raspberries, raw has 34% more |
| Potassium | 151 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.