Refried beans, canned, traditional style vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Refried beans, canned, traditional style
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Refried beans, canned, traditional style | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 90 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Equal |
| Protein | 4.98 g ★ | 2.01 g | Refried beans, canned, traditional style has 148% more |
| Carbs | 13.55 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 35% more |
| Fat | 2.01 g | 0.15 g ★ | Refried beans, canned, traditional style has 1240% more |
| Fiber | 3.7 g ★ | 3.3 g | Refried beans, canned, traditional style has 12% more |
| Sugar | 0.54 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Sodium | 370 mg | 36 mg ★ | Refried beans, canned, traditional style has 928% more |
| Calcium | 29 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 24% more |
| Iron | 1.44 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Refried beans, canned, traditional style has 109% more |
| Vitamin C | 6 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 69% more |
| Potassium | 319 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.