Restaurant, Chinese, chicken and vegetables vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Chinese, chicken and vegetables
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Chinese, chicken and vegetables | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 95 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, chicken and vegetables has 6% more |
| Protein | 8.18 g ★ | 2.01 g | Restaurant, Chinese, chicken and vegetables has 307% more |
| Carbs | 5.38 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
| Fat | 4.56 g | 0.15 g ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, chicken and vegetables has 2940% more |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 73% more |
| Sugar | 2.93 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
| Sodium | 413 mg | 36 mg ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, chicken and vegetables has 1047% more |
| Calcium | 20 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 47% more |
| Iron | 0.56 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 19% more |
| Vitamin C | 8.1 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 59% more |
| Potassium | 185 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.