Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice, without meat vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice, without meat
3 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
8 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice, without meat | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 174 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice, without meat has 45% more |
| Protein | 4.05 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 8% more |
| Carbs | 32.79 g ★ | 21.3 g | Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice, without meat has 54% more |
| Fat | 2.96 g | 1.92 g ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice, without meat has 54% more |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 61% more |
| Sugar | 0.56 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 36% more |
| Sodium | 387 mg | 7 mg ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice, without meat has 5429% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 29% more |
| Iron | 0.66 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 56% more |
| Vitamin C | 3.8 mg ★ | 0 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice, without meat has 0% more |
| Potassium | 76 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 56% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.