Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 129 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken has 43% more |
| Protein | 9.76 g ★ | 2.01 g | Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken has 386% more |
| Carbs | 6.87 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
| Fat | 6.98 g | 0.15 g ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken has 4553% more |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
| Sugar | 3.03 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 53% more |
| Sodium | 402 mg | 36 mg ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken has 1017% more |
| Calcium | 20 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 47% more |
| Iron | 0.76 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken has 10% more |
| Vitamin C | 7.1 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 64% more |
| Potassium | 218 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 54% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.