Restaurant, Chinese, sesame chicken vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Chinese, sesame chicken
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Chinese, sesame chicken | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 293 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sesame chicken has 226% more |
| Protein | 14.33 g ★ | 2.01 g | Restaurant, Chinese, sesame chicken has 613% more |
| Carbs | 26.88 g ★ | 20.71 g | Restaurant, Chinese, sesame chicken has 30% more |
| Fat | 14.25 g | 0.15 g ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sesame chicken has 9400% more |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Sugar | 15.98 g | 6.48 g ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sesame chicken has 147% more |
| Sodium | 482 mg | 36 mg ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sesame chicken has 1239% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Iron | 1.09 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sesame chicken has 58% more |
| Vitamin C | 1 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 95% more |
| Potassium | 204 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 57% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.