Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken vs Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken
6 wins
🏆
Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D
5 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 kcal | 61 kcal ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 310% more |
| Protein | 10.1 g ★ | 3.15 g | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 221% more |
| Carbs | 23.86 g ★ | 4.8 g | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 397% more |
| Fat | 12.65 g | 3.25 g ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 289% more |
| Fiber | 1 g ★ | 0 g | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 0% more |
| Sugar | 11.47 g | 5.05 g ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 127% more |
| Sodium | 246 mg | 43 mg ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 472% more |
| Calcium | 45 mg | 113 mg ★ | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 60% more |
| Iron | 2.12 mg ★ | 0.03 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 6967% more |
| Vitamin C | 2.4 mg ★ | 0 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 0% more |
| Potassium | 158 mg ★ | 132 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 20% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.