Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 108% more |
| Protein | 10.1 g ★ | 4.4 g | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 130% more |
| Carbs | 23.86 g ★ | 21.3 g | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 12% more |
| Fat | 12.65 g | 1.92 g ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 559% more |
| Fiber | 1 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 64% more |
| Sugar | 11.47 g | 0.87 g ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 1218% more |
| Sodium | 246 mg | 7 mg ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 3414% more |
| Calcium | 45 mg ★ | 17 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 165% more |
| Iron | 2.12 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 42% more |
| Vitamin C | 2.4 mg ★ | 0 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 0% more |
| Potassium | 158 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 8% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.