Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 178% more |
| Protein | 10.1 g ★ | 2.01 g | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 402% more |
| Carbs | 23.86 g ★ | 20.71 g | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 15% more |
| Fat | 12.65 g | 0.15 g ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 8333% more |
| Fiber | 1 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more |
| Sugar | 11.47 g | 6.48 g ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 77% more |
| Sodium | 246 mg | 36 mg ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 583% more |
| Calcium | 45 mg ★ | 38 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 18% more |
| Iron | 2.12 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 207% more |
| Vitamin C | 2.4 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 88% more |
| Potassium | 158 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.