Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork vs Bananas, raw
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork
5 wins
🏆
Bananas, raw
6 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork | Bananas, raw | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 270 kcal | 89 kcal ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 203% more |
| Protein | 8.91 g ★ | 1.09 g | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 717% more |
| Carbs | 23.34 g ★ | 22.84 g | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 2% more |
| Fat | 15.66 g | 0.33 g ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 4645% more |
| Fiber | 1 g | 2.6 g ★ | Bananas, raw has 62% more |
| Sugar | 10.34 g ★ | 12.23 g | Bananas, raw has 15% more |
| Sodium | 304 mg | 1 mg ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 30300% more |
| Calcium | 46 mg ★ | 5 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 820% more |
| Iron | 3.07 mg ★ | 0.26 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 1081% more |
| Vitamin C | 2.3 mg | 8.7 mg ★ | Bananas, raw has 74% more |
| Potassium | 152 mg | 358 mg ★ | Bananas, raw has 58% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.