Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork vs Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork
7 wins
🏆
Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt
4 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 270 kcal | 130 kcal ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 108% more |
| Protein | 8.91 g ★ | 2.69 g | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 231% more |
| Carbs | 23.34 g | 28.17 g ★ | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 17% more |
| Fat | 15.66 g | 0.28 g ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 5493% more |
| Fiber | 1 g ★ | 0.4 g | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 150% more |
| Sugar | 10.34 g | 0.05 g ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 20580% more |
| Sodium | 304 mg ★ | 382 mg | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 20% more |
| Calcium | 46 mg ★ | 10 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 360% more |
| Iron | 3.07 mg ★ | 0.2 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 1435% more |
| Vitamin C | 2.3 mg ★ | 0 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 0% more |
| Potassium | 152 mg ★ | 35 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 334% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.