Restaurant, family style, chili with meat and beans vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, family style, chili with meat and beans
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, family style, chili with meat and beans | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 157 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Restaurant, family style, chili with meat and beans has 74% more |
| Protein | 12.56 g ★ | 2.01 g | Restaurant, family style, chili with meat and beans has 525% more |
| Carbs | 4.57 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 78% more |
| Fat | 9.79 g | 0.15 g ★ | Restaurant, family style, chili with meat and beans has 6427% more |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Sugar | 2.27 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 65% more |
| Sodium | 381 mg | 36 mg ★ | Restaurant, family style, chili with meat and beans has 958% more |
| Calcium | 34 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 11% more |
| Iron | 1.46 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Restaurant, family style, chili with meat and beans has 112% more |
| Vitamin C | 1.1 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Potassium | 320 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.