Restaurant, family style, coleslaw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, family style, coleslaw
0 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
11 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, family style, coleslaw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 159 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Restaurant, family style, coleslaw has 77% more |
| Protein | 0.88 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 56% more |
| Carbs | 12.35 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 40% more |
| Fat | 11.78 g | 0.15 g ★ | Restaurant, family style, coleslaw has 7753% more |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
| Sugar | 9.54 g | 6.48 g ★ | Restaurant, family style, coleslaw has 47% more |
| Sodium | 221 mg | 36 mg ★ | Restaurant, family style, coleslaw has 514% more |
| Calcium | 34 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 11% more |
| Iron | 0.3 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 57% more |
| Vitamin C | 13.7 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 30% more |
| Potassium | 153 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.