Restaurant, family style, onion rings vs Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, family style, onion rings
6 wins
🏆
Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt
4 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, family style, onion rings | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 356 kcal | 130 kcal ★ | Restaurant, family style, onion rings has 174% more |
| Protein | 4.89 g ★ | 2.69 g | Restaurant, family style, onion rings has 82% more |
| Carbs | 40.72 g ★ | 28.17 g | Restaurant, family style, onion rings has 45% more |
| Fat | 19.28 g | 0.28 g ★ | Restaurant, family style, onion rings has 6786% more |
| Fiber | 2.6 g ★ | 0.4 g | Restaurant, family style, onion rings has 550% more |
| Sugar | 4.68 g | 0.05 g ★ | Restaurant, family style, onion rings has 9260% more |
| Sodium | 692 mg | 382 mg ★ | Restaurant, family style, onion rings has 81% more |
| Calcium | 21 mg ★ | 10 mg | Restaurant, family style, onion rings has 110% more |
| Iron | 0.71 mg ★ | 0.2 mg | Restaurant, family style, onion rings has 255% more |
| Potassium | 142 mg ★ | 35 mg | Restaurant, family style, onion rings has 306% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.