Restaurant, Italian, lasagna with meat vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Italian, lasagna with meat
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Italian, lasagna with meat | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 185 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Restaurant, Italian, lasagna with meat has 54% more |
| Protein | 10.83 g ★ | 4.4 g | Restaurant, Italian, lasagna with meat has 146% more |
| Carbs | 11.36 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 47% more |
| Fat | 10.69 g | 1.92 g ★ | Restaurant, Italian, lasagna with meat has 457% more |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 46% more |
| Sugar | 3.15 g | 0.87 g ★ | Restaurant, Italian, lasagna with meat has 262% more |
| Sodium | 466 mg | 7 mg ★ | Restaurant, Italian, lasagna with meat has 6557% more |
| Calcium | 197 mg ★ | 17 mg | Restaurant, Italian, lasagna with meat has 1059% more |
| Iron | 0.79 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 47% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.7 mg ★ | 0 mg | Restaurant, Italian, lasagna with meat has 0% more |
| Potassium | 255 mg ★ | 172 mg | Restaurant, Italian, lasagna with meat has 48% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.