Restaurant, Italian, lasagna with meat vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Italian, lasagna with meat
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Italian, lasagna with meat | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 185 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Restaurant, Italian, lasagna with meat has 106% more |
| Protein | 10.83 g ★ | 2.01 g | Restaurant, Italian, lasagna with meat has 439% more |
| Carbs | 11.36 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
| Fat | 10.69 g | 0.15 g ★ | Restaurant, Italian, lasagna with meat has 7027% more |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
| Sugar | 3.15 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 51% more |
| Sodium | 466 mg | 36 mg ★ | Restaurant, Italian, lasagna with meat has 1194% more |
| Calcium | 197 mg ★ | 38 mg | Restaurant, Italian, lasagna with meat has 418% more |
| Iron | 0.79 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Restaurant, Italian, lasagna with meat has 14% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.7 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 96% more |
| Potassium | 255 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 46% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.