Restaurant, Latino, Arroz con grandules (rice and pigeonpeas) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Latino, Arroz con grandules (rice and pigeonpeas)
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Latino, Arroz con grandules (rice and pigeonpeas) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 182 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Restaurant, Latino, Arroz con grandules (rice and pigeonpeas) has 102% more |
| Protein | 3.5 g ★ | 2.01 g | Restaurant, Latino, Arroz con grandules (rice and pigeonpeas) has 74% more |
| Carbs | 30.75 g ★ | 20.71 g | Restaurant, Latino, Arroz con grandules (rice and pigeonpeas) has 48% more |
| Fat | 4.98 g | 0.15 g ★ | Restaurant, Latino, Arroz con grandules (rice and pigeonpeas) has 3220% more |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 583 mg | 36 mg ★ | Restaurant, Latino, Arroz con grandules (rice and pigeonpeas) has 1519% more |
| Calcium | 8 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Iron | 0.29 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 84 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.