Restaurant, Latino, chicken and rice, entree, prepared vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Latino, chicken and rice, entree, prepared
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Latino, chicken and rice, entree, prepared | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 174 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Restaurant, Latino, chicken and rice, entree, prepared has 93% more |
| Protein | 12.02 g ★ | 2.01 g | Restaurant, Latino, chicken and rice, entree, prepared has 498% more |
| Carbs | 20.03 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 3% more |
| Fat | 5.06 g | 0.15 g ★ | Restaurant, Latino, chicken and rice, entree, prepared has 3273% more |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 64% more |
| Sugar | 0.55 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Sodium | 518 mg | 36 mg ★ | Restaurant, Latino, chicken and rice, entree, prepared has 1339% more |
| Calcium | 18 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 53% more |
| Iron | 0.95 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Restaurant, Latino, chicken and rice, entree, prepared has 38% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 184 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.