Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork vs Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork
6 wins
🏆
Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 174 kcal | 130 kcal ★ | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 34% more |
| Protein | 7.35 g ★ | 2.69 g | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 173% more |
| Carbs | 15.75 g | 28.17 g ★ | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 44% more |
| Fat | 9.04 g | 0.28 g ★ | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 3129% more |
| Fiber | 2.4 g ★ | 0.4 g | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 500% more |
| Sugar | 0.46 g | 0.05 g ★ | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 820% more |
| Sodium | 473 mg | 382 mg ★ | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 24% more |
| Calcium | 75 mg ★ | 10 mg | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 650% more |
| Iron | 0.87 mg ★ | 0.2 mg | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 335% more |
| Vitamin C | 16.4 mg ★ | 0 mg | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 0% more |
| Potassium | 152 mg ★ | 35 mg | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 334% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.