Restaurant, Latino, tripe soup vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Latino, tripe soup
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Latino, tripe soup | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 74 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 18% more |
| Protein | 8.61 g ★ | 2.01 g | Restaurant, Latino, tripe soup has 328% more |
| Carbs | 4.07 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 80% more |
| Fat | 2.58 g | 0.15 g ★ | Restaurant, Latino, tripe soup has 1620% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 411 mg | 36 mg ★ | Restaurant, Latino, tripe soup has 1042% more |
| Calcium | 22 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
| Iron | 0.68 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 1% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 81 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 83% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.