Rolls, gluten-free, white, made with brown rice flour, tapioca starch, and sorghum flour vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Rolls, gluten-free, white, made with brown rice flour, tapioca starch, and sorghum flour
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
Nutrient Rolls, gluten-free, white, made with brown rice flour, tapioca starch, and sorghum flour Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 257 kcal 90 kcal Rolls, gluten-free, white, made with brown rice flour, tapioca starch, and sorghum flour has 186% more
Protein 5.65 g 2.01 g Rolls, gluten-free, white, made with brown rice flour, tapioca starch, and sorghum flour has 181% more
Carbs 40.24 g 20.71 g Rolls, gluten-free, white, made with brown rice flour, tapioca starch, and sorghum flour has 94% more
Fat 8.2 g 0.15 g Rolls, gluten-free, white, made with brown rice flour, tapioca starch, and sorghum flour has 5367% more
Fiber 2.9 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 12% more
Sugar 2.98 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 54% more
Sodium 544 mg 36 mg Rolls, gluten-free, white, made with brown rice flour, tapioca starch, and sorghum flour has 1411% more
Calcium 41 mg 38 mg Rolls, gluten-free, white, made with brown rice flour, tapioca starch, and sorghum flour has 8% more
Iron 0.89 mg 0.69 mg Rolls, gluten-free, white, made with brown rice flour, tapioca starch, and sorghum flour has 29% more
Vitamin C 0 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Potassium 165 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 65% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.