Roselle, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Roselle, raw
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Roselle, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 49 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 46% more |
| Protein | 0.96 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 52% more |
| Carbs | 11.31 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
| Fat | 0.64 g | 0.15 g ★ | Roselle, raw has 327% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 6 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 83% more |
| Calcium | 215 mg ★ | 38 mg | Roselle, raw has 466% more |
| Iron | 1.48 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Roselle, raw has 114% more |
| Vitamin C | 12 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 39% more |
| Potassium | 208 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 56% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.