Salami, cooked, beef and pork vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Salami, cooked, beef and pork
3 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Salami, cooked, beef and pork | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 336 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Salami, cooked, beef and pork has 180% more |
| Protein | 21.85 g ★ | 4.4 g | Salami, cooked, beef and pork has 397% more |
| Carbs | 2.4 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 89% more |
| Fat | 25.9 g | 1.92 g ★ | Salami, cooked, beef and pork has 1249% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0.96 g | 0.87 g ★ | Salami, cooked, beef and pork has 10% more |
| Sodium | 1740 mg | 7 mg ★ | Salami, cooked, beef and pork has 24757% more |
| Calcium | 15 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 12% more |
| Iron | 1.56 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Salami, cooked, beef and pork has 5% more |
| Potassium | 316 mg ★ | 172 mg | Salami, cooked, beef and pork has 84% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.