Salami, cooked, beef and pork vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Salami, cooked, beef and pork
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Salami, cooked, beef and pork | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 336 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Salami, cooked, beef and pork has 273% more |
| Protein | 21.85 g ★ | 2.01 g | Salami, cooked, beef and pork has 987% more |
| Carbs | 2.4 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 88% more |
| Fat | 25.9 g | 0.15 g ★ | Salami, cooked, beef and pork has 17167% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0.96 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 85% more |
| Sodium | 1740 mg | 36 mg ★ | Salami, cooked, beef and pork has 4733% more |
| Calcium | 15 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
| Iron | 1.56 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Salami, cooked, beef and pork has 126% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 316 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.