Salami, dry or hard, pork vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Salami, dry or hard, pork
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Salami, dry or hard, pork | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 407 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Salami, dry or hard, pork has 352% more |
| Protein | 22.58 g ★ | 2.01 g | Salami, dry or hard, pork has 1023% more |
| Carbs | 1.6 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Fat | 33.72 g | 0.15 g ★ | Salami, dry or hard, pork has 22380% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 2260 mg | 36 mg ★ | Salami, dry or hard, pork has 6178% more |
| Calcium | 13 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 66% more |
| Iron | 1.3 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Salami, dry or hard, pork has 88% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 378 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 20% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.