Salami, Italian, pork vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Salami, Italian, pork
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Salami, Italian, pork | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 425 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Salami, Italian, pork has 372% more |
| Protein | 21.7 g ★ | 2.01 g | Salami, Italian, pork has 980% more |
| Carbs | 1.2 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Fat | 37 g | 0.15 g ★ | Salami, Italian, pork has 24567% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 1.2 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 81% more |
| Sodium | 1890 mg | 36 mg ★ | Salami, Italian, pork has 5150% more |
| Calcium | 10 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
| Iron | 1.52 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Salami, Italian, pork has 120% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 340 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 28% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.