Sauce, plum, ready-to-serve vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Sauce, plum, ready-to-serve
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Sauce, plum, ready-to-serve | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 184 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Sauce, plum, ready-to-serve has 104% more |
| Protein | 0.89 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 56% more |
| Carbs | 42.81 g ★ | 20.71 g | Sauce, plum, ready-to-serve has 107% more |
| Fat | 1.04 g | 0.15 g ★ | Sauce, plum, ready-to-serve has 593% more |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 538 mg | 36 mg ★ | Sauce, plum, ready-to-serve has 1394% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Iron | 1.43 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Sauce, plum, ready-to-serve has 107% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.5 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Potassium | 259 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.