Sauce, worcestershire vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Sauce, worcestershire
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Sauce, worcestershire | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 77 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 14% more |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Carbs | 19.17 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 7% more |
| Fat | 0 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 10.03 g | 6.48 g ★ | Sauce, worcestershire has 55% more |
| Sodium | 1300 mg | 36 mg ★ | Sauce, worcestershire has 3511% more |
| Calcium | 107 mg ★ | 38 mg | Sauce, worcestershire has 182% more |
| Iron | 5.3 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Sauce, worcestershire has 668% more |
| Vitamin C | 13 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 34% more |
| Potassium | 800 mg ★ | 475 mg | Sauce, worcestershire has 68% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.