Sausage, Polish, beef with chicken, hot vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Sausage, Polish, beef with chicken, hot
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Sausage, Polish, beef with chicken, hot | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 259 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Sausage, Polish, beef with chicken, hot has 188% more |
| Protein | 17.6 g ★ | 2.01 g | Sausage, Polish, beef with chicken, hot has 776% more |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 83% more |
| Fat | 19.4 g | 0.15 g ★ | Sausage, Polish, beef with chicken, hot has 12833% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1540 mg | 36 mg ★ | Sausage, Polish, beef with chicken, hot has 4178% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Iron | 0.88 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Sausage, Polish, beef with chicken, hot has 28% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 237 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 50% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.