Sausage, Polish, pork and beef, smoked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Sausage, Polish, pork and beef, smoked
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Sausage, Polish, pork and beef, smoked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 301 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Sausage, Polish, pork and beef, smoked has 234% more |
| Protein | 12.07 g ★ | 2.01 g | Sausage, Polish, pork and beef, smoked has 500% more |
| Carbs | 1.98 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 90% more |
| Fat | 26.56 g | 0.15 g ★ | Sausage, Polish, pork and beef, smoked has 17607% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 848 mg | 36 mg ★ | Sausage, Polish, pork and beef, smoked has 2256% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Iron | 1 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Sausage, Polish, pork and beef, smoked has 45% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 189 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 60% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.