Seal, ringed, meat (Alaska Native) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Seal, ringed, meat (Alaska Native)
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Seal, ringed, meat (Alaska Native) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 142 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Seal, ringed, meat (Alaska Native) has 58% more |
| Protein | 28.4 g ★ | 2.01 g | Seal, ringed, meat (Alaska Native) has 1313% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 3.2 g | 0.15 g ★ | Seal, ringed, meat (Alaska Native) has 2033% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 110 mg | 36 mg ★ | Seal, ringed, meat (Alaska Native) has 206% more |
| Calcium | 5 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 87% more |
| Iron | 19.6 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Seal, ringed, meat (Alaska Native) has 2741% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.