Snacks, fruit leather, pieces, with vitamin C vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Snacks, fruit leather, pieces, with vitamin C
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Snacks, fruit leather, pieces, with vitamin C | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 373 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Snacks, fruit leather, pieces, with vitamin C has 314% more |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 95% more |
| Carbs | 85.2 g ★ | 20.71 g | Snacks, fruit leather, pieces, with vitamin C has 311% more |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 0.15 g ★ | Snacks, fruit leather, pieces, with vitamin C has 2233% more |
| Fiber | 3.5 g ★ | 3.3 g | Snacks, fruit leather, pieces, with vitamin C has 6% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 317 mg | 36 mg ★ | Snacks, fruit leather, pieces, with vitamin C has 781% more |
| Calcium | 18 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 53% more |
| Iron | 0.75 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Snacks, fruit leather, pieces, with vitamin C has 9% more |
| Vitamin C | 120 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Snacks, fruit leather, pieces, with vitamin C has 512% more |
| Potassium | 164 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 65% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.