Snacks, pork skins, barbecue-flavor vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Snacks, pork skins, barbecue-flavor
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Snacks, pork skins, barbecue-flavor | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 538 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Snacks, pork skins, barbecue-flavor has 498% more |
| Protein | 57.9 g ★ | 2.01 g | Snacks, pork skins, barbecue-flavor has 2781% more |
| Carbs | 1.6 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Fat | 31.8 g | 0.15 g ★ | Snacks, pork skins, barbecue-flavor has 21100% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 2667 mg | 36 mg ★ | Snacks, pork skins, barbecue-flavor has 7308% more |
| Calcium | 43 mg ★ | 38 mg | Snacks, pork skins, barbecue-flavor has 13% more |
| Iron | 1.04 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Snacks, pork skins, barbecue-flavor has 51% more |
| Vitamin C | 1.5 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Potassium | 180 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 62% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.