Snacks, taro chips vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Snacks, taro chips
7 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
4 wins
| Nutrient | Snacks, taro chips | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 498 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Snacks, taro chips has 453% more |
| Protein | 2.3 g ★ | 2.01 g | Snacks, taro chips has 14% more |
| Carbs | 68.1 g ★ | 20.71 g | Snacks, taro chips has 229% more |
| Fat | 24.9 g | 0.15 g ★ | Snacks, taro chips has 16500% more |
| Fiber | 7.2 g ★ | 3.3 g | Snacks, taro chips has 118% more |
| Sugar | 3.82 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 41% more |
| Sodium | 342 mg | 36 mg ★ | Snacks, taro chips has 850% more |
| Calcium | 60 mg ★ | 38 mg | Snacks, taro chips has 58% more |
| Iron | 1.2 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Snacks, taro chips has 74% more |
| Vitamin C | 5 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
| Potassium | 755 mg ★ | 475 mg | Snacks, taro chips has 59% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.