Sorghum flour, whole-grain vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Sorghum flour, whole-grain
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Sorghum flour, whole-grain | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 359 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Sorghum flour, whole-grain has 299% more |
| Protein | 8.43 g ★ | 2.01 g | Sorghum flour, whole-grain has 319% more |
| Carbs | 76.64 g ★ | 20.71 g | Sorghum flour, whole-grain has 270% more |
| Fat | 3.34 g | 0.15 g ★ | Sorghum flour, whole-grain has 2127% more |
| Fiber | 6.6 g ★ | 3.3 g | Sorghum flour, whole-grain has 100% more |
| Sugar | 1.94 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more |
| Sodium | 3 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Iron | 3.14 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Sorghum flour, whole-grain has 355% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.8 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 96% more |
| Potassium | 324 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 32% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.