Sorghum grain vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Sorghum grain
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Sorghum grain | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 329 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Sorghum grain has 266% more |
| Protein | 10.62 g ★ | 2.01 g | Sorghum grain has 428% more |
| Carbs | 72.09 g ★ | 20.71 g | Sorghum grain has 248% more |
| Fat | 3.46 g | 0.15 g ★ | Sorghum grain has 2207% more |
| Fiber | 6.7 g ★ | 3.3 g | Sorghum grain has 103% more |
| Sugar | 2.53 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
| Sodium | 2 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Calcium | 13 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 66% more |
| Iron | 3.36 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Sorghum grain has 387% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 363 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 24% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.