Soup, tomato bisque, canned, prepared with equal volume water vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Soup, tomato bisque, canned, prepared with equal volume water
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | Soup, tomato bisque, canned, prepared with equal volume water | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 50 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 44% more |
| Protein | 0.92 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 54% more |
| Carbs | 9.6 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 54% more |
| Fat | 1.02 g | 0.15 g ★ | Soup, tomato bisque, canned, prepared with equal volume water has 580% more |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 424 mg | 36 mg ★ | Soup, tomato bisque, canned, prepared with equal volume water has 1078% more |
| Calcium | 16 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Iron | 0.33 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 52% more |
| Vitamin C | 2.4 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 88% more |
| Potassium | 169 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 64% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.