Sour dressing, non-butterfat, cultured, filled cream-type vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Sour dressing, non-butterfat, cultured, filled cream-type
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
Nutrient Sour dressing, non-butterfat, cultured, filled cream-type Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 178 kcal 90 kcal Sour dressing, non-butterfat, cultured, filled cream-type has 98% more
Protein 3.25 g 2.01 g Sour dressing, non-butterfat, cultured, filled cream-type has 62% more
Carbs 4.68 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more
Fat 16.57 g 0.15 g Sour dressing, non-butterfat, cultured, filled cream-type has 10947% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 4.68 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 28% more
Sodium 48 mg 36 mg Sour dressing, non-butterfat, cultured, filled cream-type has 33% more
Calcium 113 mg 38 mg Sour dressing, non-butterfat, cultured, filled cream-type has 197% more
Iron 0.03 mg 0.69 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 96% more
Vitamin C 0.9 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 95% more
Potassium 162 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 66% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.