Succotash, (corn and limas), canned, with cream style corn vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Succotash, (corn and limas), canned, with cream style corn
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Succotash, (corn and limas), canned, with cream style corn | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 77 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 36% more |
| Protein | 2.64 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 40% more |
| Carbs | 17.61 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 17% more |
| Fat | 0.54 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 72% more |
| Fiber | 3 g ★ | 2.8 g | Succotash, (corn and limas), canned, with cream style corn has 7% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 245 mg | 7 mg ★ | Succotash, (corn and limas), canned, with cream style corn has 3400% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 35% more |
| Iron | 0.55 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 63% more |
| Vitamin C | 6.4 mg ★ | 0 mg | Succotash, (corn and limas), canned, with cream style corn has 0% more |
| Potassium | 183 mg ★ | 172 mg | Succotash, (corn and limas), canned, with cream style corn has 6% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.