Succotash, (corn and limas), canned, with cream style corn vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Succotash, (corn and limas), canned, with cream style corn
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Succotash, (corn and limas), canned, with cream style corn | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 77 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 14% more |
| Protein | 2.64 g ★ | 2.01 g | Succotash, (corn and limas), canned, with cream style corn has 31% more |
| Carbs | 17.61 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 15% more |
| Fat | 0.54 g | 0.15 g ★ | Succotash, (corn and limas), canned, with cream style corn has 260% more |
| Fiber | 3 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 9% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 245 mg | 36 mg ★ | Succotash, (corn and limas), canned, with cream style corn has 581% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more |
| Iron | 0.55 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 20% more |
| Vitamin C | 6.4 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
| Potassium | 183 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.