Succotash, (corn and limas), canned, with whole kernel corn, solids and liquids vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Succotash, (corn and limas), canned, with whole kernel corn, solids and liquids
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Succotash, (corn and limas), canned, with whole kernel corn, solids and liquids | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 63 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 48% more |
| Protein | 2.6 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 41% more |
| Carbs | 13.98 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 34% more |
| Fat | 0.49 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 74% more |
| Fiber | 2.6 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 7% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 221 mg | 7 mg ★ | Succotash, (corn and limas), canned, with whole kernel corn, solids and liquids has 3057% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 35% more |
| Iron | 0.53 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 64% more |
| Vitamin C | 4.6 mg ★ | 0 mg | Succotash, (corn and limas), canned, with whole kernel corn, solids and liquids has 0% more |
| Potassium | 163 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 5% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.