Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, with salt vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, with salt
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
Nutrient Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, with salt Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 111 kcal 90 kcal Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 23% more
Protein 5.07 g 2.01 g Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 152% more
Carbs 24.37 g 20.71 g Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 18% more
Fat 0.8 g 0.15 g Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 433% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 0 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sodium 253 mg 36 mg Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 603% more
Calcium 17 mg 38 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more
Iron 1.52 mg 0.69 mg Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 120% more
Vitamin C 8.2 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more
Potassium 410 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 14% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.