Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, without salt vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, without salt
10 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
1 wins
| Nutrient | Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, without salt | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 115 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 4% more |
| Protein | 5.07 g ★ | 4.4 g | Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 15% more |
| Carbs | 24.38 g ★ | 21.3 g | Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 14% more |
| Fat | 0.8 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 58% more |
| Fiber | 4.5 g ★ | 2.8 g | Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 61% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 17 mg | 7 mg ★ | Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 143% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg ★ | 17 mg | Equal |
| Iron | 1.52 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 2% more |
| Vitamin C | 8.2 mg ★ | 0 mg | Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 0% more |
| Potassium | 410 mg ★ | 172 mg | Succotash, (corn and limas), cooked, boiled, drained, without salt has 138% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.